The Shack
Posted by phoenixhopes on January 31, 2009
I read The Shack this week and, although this may surprise some people, I wasn’t impressed. I feel a bit guilty for that – I’ve heard such great things about it. Friends have raved. I expected to be moved and really wanted to like it but it left me more annoyed than inspired.
I should explain… I’m not much of a follower. I mean I don’t think I’m anti-social, I like people just fine and have friends, have even been a member of groups, but I’m just not one to watch a movie or read a book simply because it’s the popular thing. In fact, I’m contrary enough that if something is “the thing” then I’m likely to set it aside. Snobbish of me I know, but I just don’t put much faith in bandwagons. This means that I’m often not quite up on the popular culture — and sometimes means that I don’t discover some great things until much, much later because my snobbishness got in the way. I know there are blockbuster movies that are amazingly wonderful but I think that most blockbusters are simply the newest thing out there. I don’t use Oprah’s Book Club as suggestions for my reading list, but I’ve also read some good books and found out later she had recommended them.
So, The Shack… it seemed that the only thing I heard about this book was praise (well, except for the pastor who preached that no “good Christian” should read it because, gasp, God is portrayed as a woman and that will lead us all down the slippery slope to goddess worship. I wanted to ask him what he though about the verses in Psalms where it says that He covers us with his wings and ask if considering that word picture would lead to chicken worship but I refrained). So I resisted reading The Shack in large part because it was so well loved – I just wasn’t going to hop on the bandwagon. Like I said earlier, when I finally decided to read it I expected to be moved. This book is about a person with a deep hurt and, as a result, has a lot of questions for God. Hmmmm, sound familiar? Based on what I’d heard, I wanted to see myself and my relationship with God and experience some kind of catharsis. This is the kind of life-changing reaction to the book that I’d heard from others. Maybe I set myself up to be disappointed.
I didn’t hate the book, or think it was a bad story, I was just left a bit flat. Every good story has some underlying message, but the question is, which came first – the story or the message? While reading The Shack, I felt that the author had a message he was trying to proclaim and created the story to show a way to relate to God. I never felt that Mack had taken residence in the author’s mind and he had to put him to paper. Instead I felt that he had been moved considering how God wants to reach out to us at a very personal level and chose to create a story to explain those thoughts.
There were definitely parts of the story that I liked. I loved the garden – the chaotically, beautiful, fractal mess of the garden and what it represented. The discussion about judgement made me stop and think (and, ironically, I wonder how this post fits in). Forgiveness seemed a bit too easy, although I did appreciate that God said even in the midst of forgiveness there still may be some appropriate, lingering anger. Although it’s been said a zillion times and can easily be cliche, I needed to be reminded that it’s not about rules but about relationship.
I don’t regret that I’ve given a few hours of my life to read The Shack or feel that my time was wasted, I just wasn’t as moved as I expected, and wanted, to be. What was your experience? What did I miss?
hinzkj said
I had the same experience. I even didn’t read it for a long time because of the all the people saying how wonderful it was. I finally read it when a local pastor wrote something in the newspaper here talking about how theologically wrong and dangerous it was. I knew then that I had to read it
. I’m glad if it’s made some people see God as something more than an old man, if it spoke to them in some way about forgiveness or something else. I definitely didn’t find it to be dangerous
. I found a lot of the writing style sort of annoying.
Like you, I’m also glad that I read it and I’m glad it’s been helpful for others. It just wasn’t something that really spoke to me. And I still really don’t get the dangerous part
.
Deanna Piercy said
While I didn’t think the writing was very good, I loved reading something that confirmed some things I’ve felt or believed deep down but don’t often hear in traditional Christian circles. As I read it I kept thinking of people who have been hurt by misguided Christians and how some of the concepts expressed in the book might touch them.
phoenixhopes said
phoenixhopes said
Dang, I was trying to do the block quote thing. Let me try again….
dsimple said
I read it recently and wasn’t overly impressed, either. I didn’t hate it. Didn’t love it. Don’t know if I’d even recommend it to someone else to read. Personally, I felt like “God” (Papa) was really nothing more than a remake of The Oracle from The Matrix movies … I could even hear her voice in my head while I read. Not a bad book … not a great book … and not even a very original book (like I said, I felt like I’d seen it all before in a movie, but just making some different points). It rattled my cage a bit … found myself feeling like it was walking very close to the edge of heresy a couple of times. But I think my biggest concern would be people reading it who don’t read very carefully and might end up thinking the author was saying things he really wasn’t saying at all. My two bits for what it’s worth.
~Debi
phoenixhopes said
>>I felt like “God” (Papa) was really nothing more than a remake of The Oracle from The Matrix movies
This really cracks me up and I can totally see it!